STAFF CONTACT :
BILL
SUBJECT
DATE
The Business Council of New York State, Inc. opposes the above
referenced legislation. This
bill would, among other things, amend the Environmental Conservation
Law and the Public
Service Law by establishing stringent and overreaching standards for
outdoor lighting,
mandate the creation of “dark-sky preserves” in the state,
and establish the criminal
infraction of “light trespass.”
Specifically, the legislation would add a new section to the Environmental
Conservation Law,
known as the “Healthy, Safe and Energy Efficient Outdoor Lighting
Act”, in an attempt to
prohibit “light pollution” (defined as the adverse effects
caused by outdoor lighting which
causes “glare” and “light trespass” on another's
property). The legislation broadly attempts
to contain “glare” or “sky glow” (the illumination
of the nighttime sky that results from the
upward shining of light) by enacting very broad, far reaching and stringent
limitations on
entities that utilize outdoor lighting.
The bill would have a direct impact on the private sector, specifically
commercial and
industrial businesses, which utilize outdoor lighting programs for
a variety of purposes, not
the least of which is the safety and security of their employees and
customers. The bill
places the entities that utilize outdoor lighting for security purposes
in a precarious
situation. In efforts to provide adequate security or establish reliable
conditions for work
during evening hours, companies and individuals may face the potential
for liability under
this act. This legislation would create a confusing situation under
which exemptions must
be secured from local officials if “a compelling safety interest
cannot be adequately addressed
by any other method.” Additionally, a penalty system is established
under which those
guilty of light trespass will be subject to civil penalties.
The codification of light pollution and light trespass, and the mandatory
classification of
levels of outdoor lighting, will result in risks to public safety,
will impose significant
unnecessary costs on local taxpayers and consumers (through the possible
alteration of
existing outdoor lighting and lighting fixtures) and will create a
new and burdensome penalty
system for those who violate another's “dark space.”
The legislation would also require the Department of Environmental
Conservation, with
input from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority,
to develop a
model comprehensive outdoor lighting ordinance that utilities would
be required to send to
all customers. The cost associated with this mandated mailing of “informational
packets”
explaining outdoor lighting standards would be borne by the utility
customers in the state,
not the government implementing this experiment in public policy.
For the reasons articulated above, we oppose this legislation.